Hi Neil

Thanks for your reasoned explanation.  I came to a somewhat similar conclusion, 
but I have not acted on it.   I’ve been setting up a new user for a different 
purpose today and find that user-switching (fast or slow) is rather tedious.  
And then discover on switching that I didn’t close an application for one or 
the other users.

It crossed my mind to set up the “backup” structure at the top level, and 
wondered if I had access to it, and what would happen when Apple changed to OS 
XI or whatever.  I was intimidated by my first Mac to the extent that I rarely 
ventured beyond the Documents folder, and waited for lightning to strike if I 
put data up one level into my Home folder.  I don’t think I have permission 
problems with the sparse images - but then I haven’t tested the process under 
fire.   You have gone one step higher in the directory tree, and considered 
user permissions, so I may end up following you.

Cheers
Alan


On 15 Dec 2014, at 3:35 pm, Neil Houghton <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Alan, Hi Ronni, Hi Daniel,
> 
> Just a couple of thoughts/comments on using a separate user account and on 
> partitioning.
> 
> 
> Using a separate user account to segregate your temporary backup data
> 
> I tend to be the only user of my main computer and, in the past, I have used 
> the approach of separate user accounts to segregate distinct areas of my work 
> – in my case this was:
> Me (main user) all my usual personal computing
> Potoroo – all the work I do as a committee member and webmaster of a 
> not-for-profit community organisation
> Genealogy – all the research, documents, images etc relating to my ongoing 
> family history investigations
> 
> In the (really) old days before OSX, I just used to cover this with various 
> levels of cascading folders in my main DATA folder – but as OSX took over 
> Apple really pushed you in the direction of higher level splitting into 
> Documents/Pictures/Music/Movies etc. My first approach was that, rather than 
> creating three different (me/potoroo/genealogy) sets of subfolders in each of 
> the main Apple Documents/Pictures/Music/Movies folders, I would create the 
> three user accounts and just log into or switch to the relevant user account 
> depending on the work I was doing.
> 
> In practice, I soon found lots of problems with this approach – I won’t 
> bother highlighting them all as most of them wouldn’t be relevant to your 
> proposed use of the separate user account – the big one that, I think, could 
> be a problem for you is User permissions. Ronni has written excellent 
> articles on user permissions before – so I won’t try and go into the details 
> - and possibly introduce some errors ;o)
> 
> The thing is that Apple envisages user folders being used by different users 
> – who don’t want all their stuff being accessible to other users – so when 
> you are logged in as one user you (generally) don’t have access to stuff you 
> created when logged in as a separate user. What permissions a file gets also 
> can vary whether you move it on the same disc/partition, copy it, or move it 
> to another disc/partition (which will generally/always? Leave the original in 
> place and create a copy on the second disc/partition). 
> 
> Now there are ways around this, from using public folders to changing folder 
> and file permissions, and I always found a way to access the files I needed 
> to – but it DID become very tiresome – so the next time I did a major system 
> update, I reverted to one user for ALL my work and relied on an organised 
> filing system to keep track of it all (I do have a separate Computer Admin 
> user account that I can use for troubleshooting – but that is a different 
> use/purpose and that account does not hold any of my data/documents).
> 
> You say you are wanting a “temporary” backup storage area and I’m not sure 
> exactly how you intend to move stuff into this and (perhaps more importantly) 
> how you intend to access it if you need to use the back-ups – so I don’t know 
> how much of a problem permissions issues would be to you – but if you find 
> you NEED the backup, it would be a bad time to discover permissions issues.
> 
> If it was me, I would not create a new user account – instead I would just 
> create a new high level folder (called, say, temporary backups) and use that 
> to store the sparse images. I’m still on Snow Leopard and the main file 
> structure will no doubt have changed somewhat through Mavericks and Yosemite, 
> but the obvious option on my set-up would be a new folder, called temporary 
> backups, in users/shared – since it is outside your actual personal user 
> folder it is separated (as a new user folder would be) – but still owned by 
> you – so without the potential permissions/access problems).
> 
> On my set-up I could even create a new folder at the top level of the disc 
> (ie alongside library, System, Users etc) which would put it even more 
> “out-of-the way”  - however, personally, I prefer to leave this level clean, 
> with just the Apple created folder hierarchy.
> 
> Just my personal observations/experience/preferences – others may well feel 
> differently – you need to find what works best for you.
> 
> 
> 
> Using separate partitions on the main computer HD
> 
> I would not dream of disagreeing with Daniel’s and Ronni’s comments – 
> partitions were much more useful/used in the past when storage was much more 
> expensive. Having said that, I DO have my HD partitioned ;o)
> 
> I initially had my HD partitioned into 3:
> 
> Main OSX and all user data/documents
> Insurance back-ups from other computers
> TV programs (downloaded video from iView and other sources)
> 
> But, as Daniel mentioned, I fairly soon ran into partition size problems 
> (particularly 2) so I purchased more external drives to cover all the 
> back-ups, deleted partition 2 and re-organised to just have the 2 partitions:
> 
> Main OSX and all user data/documents
> TV programs (downloaded video from iView and other sources)
> 
> 
> The main advantage, I find, is that I have quite different back-up 
> needs/schedules for the two partitions:
> Partition 1 is my digital “life” it has 2 Superduper clones on separate 
> external drives and timemachine back-up. In addition, all the important 
> documents are synched to dropbox (and hence to 2 other computers – which also 
> have back-ups). You might say the approach is belt & braces & piece of string 
> – on 3 pairs of trousers ;o)
> Partition 2 contains a lot of data and represents a fair bit of time/effort 
> in collecting it – it would be frustrating and annoying to lose it, but 
> hardly a tragedy. I have a superduper clone of this on a separate external 
> HD, which I update after adding a bunch of new content. I am happy with just 
> one clone and no time machine back-up – it’s just TV programs.
> 
> I COULD have all this on one partition, exclude the TV stuff from Time 
> machine, and set-up more complex superduper scripts for back-up. But I do 
> find the two partition set-up the most convenient for me, at present. Having 
> said that, I can envisage myself setting up a network drive, attached 
> directly to the router, and ending up with video and music on that – and 
> leaving the computer clean of all that (and with just one partition).
> 
> I have had no problems with my partitioning – but I DO research carefully how 
> it all works, read several “how-to”s including Apple’ and Ronni’s and make 
> sure I know exactly what I am going to do BEFORE I start. It goes without 
> saying that everything has back-ups before doing any of this – but you are 
> obviously a conscientious baker-upper and well-aware of these needs ;o)
> 
> Again just my personal observations/experience/preferences – others may well 
> feel differently – you need to find what works best for you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Cheers
> 
> 
> 
> Neil
> -- 
> Neil R. Houghton
> Albany, Western Australia
> Tel: +61 8 9841 6063
> Email: [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> on 14/12/14 20:44, Alan Smith at [email protected] wrote:
> 
> > Hi Daniel
> > 
> > Thanks for your input.  Yes, I’ve had the problem of partitions ending up 
> > the 
> > wrong size down the track.
> > 
> > I wanted a “temporary” backup storage area as several “spare” external 
> > drives 
> > have data relating to the 2009 iMac in its various stages of decline and 
> > recovery.  I don’t want to delete them yet.
> >   
> > I decided on the sparse image approach because SuperDuper erases the target 
> > disk as part of its process - and I didn’t want that going on near the boot 
> > drive. I decided that I could put several images in the one partition, 
> > which 
> > could be moved one at a time if space became an issue.
> > 
> > However, I am now thinking that my security needs (fumble fingers, not web 
> > probes!) could be improved by putting the sparse images in the standard 
> > structure of a second (bold, italic and underline!) user account.  The 
> > images 
> > only need accessing once a month in normal times.  May keep them there, and 
> > not worry about external drives at all …
> > 
> > Cheers
> > Alan
> > 
> > 
> > On 14 Dec 2014, at 7:22 pm, Daniel Kerr <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> You can create one partition on a Fusion drive, after that ,…no.
> >> More info here. - http://support.apple.com/en-au/HT202574
> >> My personal opinion on partitions on internal drives,…and again I point 
> >> out,..this is my personal opinion, I think partitions are a waste of time.
> >> You're not gaining any benefit with a partition, and nine times out of 
> >> ten, 
> >> down the track either Part A or Part B of the partition is the "wrong 
> >> size". 
> >> Then you have to go back to square one.
> >> Generally just easier to a) get another external drive as a backup (as 
> >> externals are cheap), as you'll spend less "money time" on it and can get 
> >> larger sizes,…or just create a backup folder to back up to.
> >> There's no real "benefit" in partitioning I find…not these days. It's not 
> >> like if one partition dies it's not going to affect the other partition, 
> >> as 
> >> it's the same drive…….
> >> 
> >> Again, just my take on it,…..
> >> 
> >> Kind regards
> >> Daniel
> >> 
> >> Sent from my iPhone 6
> >> 
> >> ---
> >> Daniel Kerr
> >> MacWizardry
> >> 
> >> Phone: 0414 795 960
> >> Email: <daniel AT macwizardry.com.au>
> >> Web:   <http://www.macwizardry.com.au>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> **For everything Apple**
> >> 
> >> NOTE: Any information provided in this email may be my personal opinion 
> >> and 
> >> as such should be taken accordingly, and may not be the views of 
> >> MacWizardry. 
> >> Any information provided does not offer or warrant any form of warranty or 
> >> accept liability. It would be appreciated that if any information in this 
> >> email is to be disseminated, distributed or copied, that permission by the 
> >> author be requested. 
> >> 
> >> On 13/12/2014, at 1:04 PM, Alan Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> I would like to utilise some of the vast unused space on the internal 
> >>> drives 
> >>> of two iMacs as backups for films.    Is this possible?   If it is 
> >>> possible 
> >>> then what is the downside?   Could such a partition be later removed to 
> >>> restore the space to OS X?   I do not want to go through the disk-erase 
> >>> and 
> >>> OS X re-install operation!
> >>> 
> >>> My concept is to use SuperDuper to create a sparse image (which permits 
> >>> smart updates) of some of the films on a USB 3 external drive.     In 
> >>> practice I would use say three sparse images for ease of management.
> >>> 
> >>> iMac 1 (2012) has 1TB with Fusion Drive.  iMac 2 (2009) has a standard 
> >>> 1TB 
> >>> drive.  I would prefer to use the Fusion Drive iMac for the backups.  
> >>> Both 
> >>> iMacs have Mavericks installed, and hence should also have Recovery 
> >>> partitions.   (If an OS X upgrade or Boot Camp can install partitions, 
> >>> why 
> >>> not me??)
> >>> 
> >>> I have assumed a partition would be needed, but can a sparse image simply 
> >>> be 
> >>> used as a file within the ‘Macintosh HD’ OS X startup volume structure?
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Regards, 
> >>> Alan
> >>> 
> >>> Alan Smith
> >>> Late 2012 iMac 27" Intel Quad Core i5  Fusion 3.2GHz 8G RAM - OSX 10.9.5 
> >>> Mavericks
> >>> Late 2009 iMac 21.5" Intel Core 2 Duo 3.06GHz 12G RAM - OSX 10.9.5 
> >>> Mavericks
> >>> iPhone5;  iPad2;  ATV2
> 
> -- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
> Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
> Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
> Settings & Unsubscribe - 
> <http://lists.wamug.org.au/listinfo/wamug.org.au-wamug>

-- The WA Macintosh User Group Mailing List --
Archives - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/archives.shtml>
Guidelines - <http://www.wamug.org.au/mailinglist/guidelines.shtml>
Settings & Unsubscribe - <http://lists.wamug.org.au/listinfo/wamug.org.au-wamug>