Jani - iki : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ As of his fourth report to the Security Council, the Prosecutor has found "reasonable grounds to believe that the individuals identified [in the UN Security Council Resolution 1593] have committed crimes against humanity and war crimes," but did not find sufficient evidence to prosecute for genocide.[34]
--- Jaksa penuntut tidak menemukan fakta-fakta yang cukup untuk menuntut untuk genocide. Ngono mas Pagi --oo0oo-- Wikan Danar Sunindyo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Terima kasih Mas Jano ... kira2 yang jadi korban dalam konflik di Darfur itu siapa ya? dan siapa yang melakukannya? terus, kira2 apa ya hukuman buat orang2 yang melakukan genosida di Darfur matur nuwun, nggih Mas Jano ... wassalam, -- wikan http://wikan.multiply.com On 6/4/07, jano ko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Mas Wikan : > > Pak Dana, > kalau konflik Sudan di Darfur apa masuk genosida juga? > > ----------------------------------------- > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide#Darfur > > The on-going conflict in Darfur, Sudan, which started in 2003, was declared a > "genocide" by United States Secretary of State Colin Powell on September 9, > 2004 in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.[29] Since > that time however, no other permanent member of the UN Security Council has > followed suit. In fact, in January 2005, an International Commission of > Inquiry on Darfur, authorized by UN Security Council Resolution 1564 of 2004, > issued a report to the Secretary-General stating that "the Government of the > Sudan has not pursued a policy of genocide."[30] Nevertheless, the Commission > cautioned that "The conclusion that no genocidal policy has been pursued and > implemented in Darfur by the Government authorities, directly or through the > militias under their control, should not be taken in any way as detracting > from the gravity of the crimes perpetrated in that region. International > offences such as the crimes against humanity and war crimes that have been > committed in Darfur may be no less serious and heinous than genocide."[31] In > March 2005, the Security Council formally referred the situation in Darfur to > the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, taking into account the > Commission report but without mentioning any specific crimes.[32] Two > permanent members of the Security Council, the United States and China, > abstained from the vote on the referral resolution.[33] As of his fourth > report to the Security Council, the Prosecutor has found "reasonable grounds > to believe that the individuals identified [in the UN Security Council > Resolution 1593] have committed crimes against humanity and war crimes," but > did not find sufficient evidence to prosecute for genocide.[34] Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]