http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/29/AR2009062903455.html?wpisrc=newsletter

In Morocco, an Alternative to Iran
      
By Anne Applebaum
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 

RABAT -- If you want an antidote to the photographs of police officers beating 
demonstrators and girls dying on the streets of the Iranian capital, take a 
drive through the streets of the Moroccan capital. You might see demonstrators, 
but not under attack: On the day I visited, a group of people politely waving 
signs stood outside the parliament. You might see girls, but they will not be 
sniper targets, and they will not all look like their Iranian counterparts: 
Though there is clearly a fashion for long, flowing headscarves and blue jeans, 
many women would not look out of place in New York or Paris. 

Welcome to the kingdom of Morocco, a place which, in the light of the past two 
week's events in Iran, merits a few minutes of reflection. Unlike Turkey, 
Morocco is not a secular state: The king claims direct descent from the prophet 
Mohammed. Nor does Morocco aspire to be European: Though French is still the 
language of business and higher education, the country is linguistically and 
culturally part of the Arabic-speaking world. But unlike most of its Arab 
neighbors, the country has over the past decade undergone a slow but profound 
transformation from traditional monarchy to constitutional monarchy, acquiring 
along the way real political parties, a relatively free press, new political 
leaders -- the mayor of Marrakesh is a 33-year-old woman -- and a set of family 
laws that strive to be compatible both with sharia and international 
conventions on human rights. 

The result is not what anyone would call a liberal democratic paradise. One 
human rights activist painted for me a byzantine portrait of electoral 
corruption, involving "mediators" who "organize" votes on behalf of candidates. 
Others point out that if the demonstrators I saw at the parliament had been 
Islamic radicals or Western Saharan guerrilla leaders, rather than trade 
unionists, the police might not have been quite so blasé. Though women have 
legal rights, cultural restraints remain. A tiny fraction of the population 
reads newspapers, even fewer have Internet access, and somewhere between 40 and 
50 percent of the country is illiterate; as a result, election turnout is very 
low. Political posters feature symbols, not words. 

Yet in at least one sense, Morocco truly stands out: Alone in the region, the 
Moroccan government has admitted to carrying out political crimes, and it has 
set up a "Truth Commission" along South African and South American lines. 
Beginning in 2004, the commission investigated crimes, held televised hearings 
and paid compensation to some 23,000 victims and their families. The crimes in 
question -- arbitrary arrests, "disappearances," torture, executions -- 
occurred during the reign of King Hassan II, who died in 1999. The Truth 
Commission is the creation of his son, King Mohammed VI. But although this 
acknowledgement of wrongdoing was made possible by a generational change, it 
did not require a regime change. There was no revolution, no violence. The king 
is still the king, and he still has his collection of antique cars. 

The result of the Truth Commission's work is a kind of social peace. Not 
everybody likes the monarchy, but even its opponents concede that the break 
with the past is real: If nothing else, people feel it's safe to speak openly, 
safe to form civil rights groups, safe to criticize the electoral process, even 
safe to complain about the king. Saadia Belmir -- a Moroccan judge and the 
first female Muslim member of the U.N. Committee on Torture -- told me that 
despite obstacles, "we can now build the future on the basis of our good 
understanding of the past." Controversially, perpetrators were allowed to fade 
into the background. But the crosscurrents of anger and revenge that might 
otherwise have marked the young king's reign have subsided. 

Is this a model for others? The Moroccans think so, and they have quietly 
"shared their experiences" with African and Middle Eastern neighbors. Belmir 
told me that an informal group had been working on setting up a Truth 
Commission in Togo; others hint at Jordan, though of course that's unofficial. 
They all hasten to point out that their formula -- slow transformation under 
the aegis of a (so far) popular king -- doesn't apply everywhere. One thinks 
wistfully of the shah of Iran and of what might have been. 

Still, watching the extraordinary range of clothing and skin colors on the 
Moroccan streets, one takes away at least one thought: Transformation from 
authoritarianism to democracy is possible, even in an avowedly Islamic state, 
even with an ethnically mixed population, even with the presence of a jihadist 
fringe. More importantly: It is possible to acknowledge and discuss human 
rights violations in this culture, just as they can be discussed elsewhere. 
Just because much of the Arab world lacks the political will to change doesn't 
mean that change is always and forever impossible. 

applebaumlett...@washpost.com 





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke