Claes Persson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Al Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 8:08 PM
> Subject: {W&P} International Criminal Court
>
>
> > European taxpayers have been taking a free ride on US taxpayers for well
> >
> > over a half century.
> >
> > We have provided a substantial portion of Europe's military security
> > needs, leaving Europeans with the cash to pay for their socialistic
> > welfare schemes.
> >
> > If the USA continues to be pressured to accept the attack on our
> > national sovereignty and independence represented by the ICC, then
> > Europeans may learn the cost of providing for all of their own security,
> >
> > as well as the cost of picking up our share of responsibility for
> > international peacekeeping efforts.
> >
> > There's a bill in the US Congress authorizing the use of force to rescue
> >
> > kidnapped Americans befor they are subjected to trial in an ICC that we
> > are not a party to. Even Hillary Clinton has voiced support for the
> > bill.
> >
> > That's how it _is_.
> >
> > Learn to cope with it, Europe.
> >
>
> I see. No one is above the law. Not bosnians. Not rwandans or any one
> else. Except America!
>
> Claes
> §( :8-)
>
---------------------------
Many Americans doubt that the ICC will really follow the principles of
the rule of law. We believe there will be an anti-American bias that
will find excuses to go after Americans for political reasons, or just
because of prejudice. The ICC will never go after Comrade Fidel Castro
for his political prisons, torture chambers, murderous attempts to
subvert other governments and executions of dissidents. He's a Communist
and an enemy of the USA so he will get a pass.
For Europeans, I repeat: get ready to pay higher taxes for providing
your own miltary umbrella -- or learn to live without some of your
socialistic welfare schemes. You've lived off of the US taxpayer and
depended on US military personnel for a long time. You want our people
to risk being prosecuted for unintentional casualties or trumped up
lies? Why should we?
An example is in the news rigt now. Some Afghans are claiming that a US
AC-130 gunship killed 40 members of a wedding party. Invetigators on the
scene have asked to see the bodies or the burial ground. No one can
point to any. Or even to any blood inthe building where the deaths
supposedly occurred. This story, without any evidence, just the words of
people in a part of Afghanistan that was the stronghold of the Taliban
where the people remain sympathtic to the Talban. Sooner or later
there'll be an attempt to prosecute an American in an incident of this
kind.
I hope we declare war on any nation that has any part in circumventing
reasonable legal procedures and ignoring US sovereignty to kidnap an
American and subject him to this lawless kangaroo court.
___________________________________________________________
Check out http://clik.to/sf for other lists to join.
A93MR48T18
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1dhdK.b1tdRU
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
