Claes Persson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Al Winslow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2002 11:11 PM
> Subject: RE: {W&P} VB: Emailing: foto7w
>
>
> >
> > I'm unable to access the pictures.
>
> --Sorry about that. Computercommunications are fantastic - when they
> work!
>
> >
> > I'm asking this in all honesty and good faith -- what is the theory of
> > what happened if it wasn't a plane?
>
> --I have myself no theory, but I have seen on a site speculations and
> photos from a camera overlooking a parkingplace that shows, over a sighn
> in the sight direction, the fin of an aeroplane, but that fin is not of
> the size of an airliner but rather a smaller jet. Unfortunatelly I think
> I have waited too long to bring it up. Now I can not find this site
> again. If this photo was real? I don't know.
>
> >
> > Why would the hundreds of witnesses on the busy roads lie about seeing a
> >
> > plane fly into the building? It was a normal Tuesday morning with lots
> > of traffic in the area. It's a very busy area. There's no way to fake
> > it.
>
> --Puzzling, I agree. But still - the hole and the lack of debree outside
> indicates that something is wrong. Maybe.
> >
> > What possible motivation could there be for the creation of a false
> > report that it was a plane if it was something else? On a morning when
> > three other planes definitely crashed, two of them in full view of TV
> > cameras from several angles, why would the government or whoever need to
> >
> > invent a story?
>
> --I don't know. It's difficult to make a guess from Sweden. Those more
> used to USA could maybe come up with something?
> >
> > You can see for yourself that the plane entered the building at ground
> > level. It was reported that it hit the ground just before it hit the
> > building. That would have started the breakup of the wings, etc.
>
> --I can see that something entered the building at ground level, but the
> absence of debree make me wonder if it was an airliner of the size
> indicated in the reports.
> >
> > 150 tons of airframe going maybe 400 miles per hour would bury itself in
> >
> > any building. The momentum would carry pieces and parts well into the
> > building.
>
> --With that momentum in mind you must expect that the two giant and
> heavy engines would have made separate holes of their own on each side
> of the hole the fuselage have done. Or stayed outside beeing nearly two
> storys high.
>
> >
> > When planes crash into the earth at a steep angle there is often little
> > or nothing left of the plane showing above ground. The entire thing
> > smashes itself into a hole. Aircraft are relatively fragile for their
> > size and weight.
>
> --Right, but there is also holes after the engines made at impact, and
> there is no such things in Pentagon.
>
> --I must add to this that for me here in Sweden this make no sense as I
> can not guess why and whatfore this should have been faked. But still...
>
> Claes
> §( :8-)
>
>
--------------------------
We can find websites and articles that speculate about many things.
There are people who believe -- or pretend to believe because it sells
books -- that Elvis didn't die. I'd put this speculation about the
Pentagon attack in the same category.
We saw the hole in the building. SOMETHING made that hole.
Since there were passengers on Flight 77 who died and hundreds if not
thousands of eyewitnesses who SAW the plane fly into the building I'd
say that it is a pretty safe bet that the plane did, indeed, fly into
the building.
Again -- we saw the hole in the building. SOMETHING made that hole.
It happened on the same morning when three other planes were most
definitely hijacked. We SAW two of the crash into the WTC ourselves. So
it isn't exactly the height of gullibilty to think that anoter plane
flew ito the Pentagon.
The people on the plane were not making up the stories they were telling
their loved ones via cell phone.
Speculating can be fun, but there has to be some rational basis for it.
This one makes no sense at all. I've said my last word on it unless
someone comes up with a video tape of a Ryder Truck exploding next to
the Pentagon, or a UFO zapping the building with a ray-gun.
___________________________________________________________
Check out http://clik.to/sf for other lists to join.
A93MR48T18
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1dhdK.b1tdRU
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
