On 5/21/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But still I'd leave the BOOL in there (you could make it C99 bool though), > since neither uint8_t nor uint32_t are really descriptive about the boolean > meaning of their contents.
We need a boolean value that has a guaranteed known bit width. AFAIK the C99 bool is not. I also do not know how wide the native win32 BOOL type is. - Per _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
