Giel van Schijndel schreef:
> Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Merged revisions 
>>> 5098,5102,5126-5128,5131,5135-5136,5139-5141,5148,5150,5153,5155,5164,5166,5168-5169,5171,5174-5175,5180,5184,5186,5192-5193,5215-5217,5219,5222,5225-5226,5228-5229,5232,5235-5236,5242-5243,5246,5255-5257,5259,5274,5284,5287-5288,5303-5304,5311-5312,5330-5331,5334,5336,5338,5340,5351,5396-5398,5420,5447,5469,5522,5528,5538,5542-5543,5546-5548,5553,5558,5560-5561,5564,5568,5574-5577,5584-5585,5587,5589-5590,5594-5597,5600-5603,5606-5609,5611,5614-5617,5622,5625,5629-5631
>>>  via svnmerge from
>> Why are you merging all these revisions into a stable branch???
> 
> It's basically dead code removal. Though if you meant to ask: "what does
> it gain us", then aside from cleaner code the answer is: nothing.
> 
> Most of the changed lines (as opposed to just removed) are just changed
> because of removing macros that "forwarded" their calls to functions
> (instead the functions are called directly).

PS: I purposefully did *not* backport revisions that altered code in
such a way to create dead code or change behaviour. In fact after
preprocessing the code should be *exactly* the same (except for
whitespace and comments).

-- 
Giel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Reply via email to