On 5/28/09, Kreuvf <kre...@warzone2100.de> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > bugs buggy wrote: > > Since nobody has had time to update the docs/* to make them current, I > > think we should just scrub that directory, and instead have links to > > our web site & wiki & FAQ. Those are mostly up to date, and we > > wouldn't really need to do anything. > > Did you take a look at the current state of the docs? Last time I talked to > you > about it (~week ago?) the only thing mentioned was that some paths are not > correct anymore.
New command line options, cheat warning, paths, default values for the new entries in the config file, and so on... > > So, if those files are about to be excluded from distribution then at least > make > sure that all the information contained in them right now is available > online as > well. All that information is on the wiki & FAQ is it not? > > Additionally I strongly dislike the idea of not having offline help resources > anymore. True, but this is only temporary, until we get a chance to update the docs. For what it is worth, I did take a crack at it, but I can only handle the English readme.en, the German & xhtml versions still need fixing. It still is missing lots of the new command line / config options, and I don't got the time to fix it as it should be fixed. > This is even worse considering that wz2100.net to the best of my > knowledge is the only mirror for the aforementioned resources and down-times > happen. So I propose adding the following to the doc-files instead of > excluding > them: > "This file has not been updated since the release of 2.1. Some information > may > not be correct any more. For current information visit the homepage of the > Warzone 2100 Resurrection Project." > > - - Kreuvf I guess the disclaimer can work as well... either or works for me. And we always have google cache ;) _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
