On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:21 PM, buginator <buginato...@gmail.com> wrote: > Note, it seems that the license for this stuff is Apache 2, and that > doesn't mesh well with our license, so, I believe, that we can't have > this in our repo. > It doesn't look like having static or dynamic version of this changes > anything either.
That is unfortunate. It is a gray area, and not everyone agree with the FSF's interpretation of the situation (most notably, Apache). Could we ask upstream for a more clear cut license? - Per _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
