Ryan Lubke wrote:
> Doesn't pay to rush does it :).
> Fixed.
Thanks for the fast turn around
> So aside from this problem with the Host header, how goes testing?
Not bad after your fix running against Jetty 4.0 Beta0:
[515] ant servlet
...
[java] [watchdog] ------- TEST SUMMARY -------
[java] [watchdog] *** 348 TEST(S) PASSED! ***
[java] [watchdog] *** 0 TEST(S) FAILED! ***
[516] ant jsp
...
[java] [watchdog] ------- TEST SUMMARY -------
[java] [watchdog] *** 182 TEST(S) PASSED! ***
[java] [watchdog] *** 0 TEST(S) FAILED! ***
But I'm sure you guys will add some more tests soon that will ruin this for me :-(
I'm very interested to see how we go when security constraints are added
to the tests. I know it will be a bit difficult to get a test infrustructure
going, but that part of the spec is very vague and is going to be rich
pickings for different interpretaions!
thanks again.
--
Greg Wilkins<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GB Phone: +44-(0)7092063462
Mort Bay Consulting Australia and UK. Mbl Phone: +61-(0)4 17786631
http://www.mortbay.com AU Phone: +61-(0)2 98107029
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
