On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: > As I've said before, we can certainly have a box (VM) to run an > instance, for development purposes. > > The idea of moving development discussion onto it will require more > effort and discussion. > > Apache is strict about the fact that all discussion should be > asynchronous and archived. This allows for a distribution of folks over > time zones (and working patterns) and for all decisions to be recorded > for posterity. Traditionally, mailing lists are the only technology that > meets this need. >
Thanks for the reminder, Upayavira. Waves could possibly achieve the same, but we'd need to explore that > (e.g. in a mailing list, you cannot delete someone's post, but I believe > you can in a wave - how do we make sure no-one goes and deletes bits of > history they find undesirable?) > The good news is that the wave model supports this, though Wave in a Box doesn't currently have the "playback" feature implemented. It is a discussion I am expecting to happen during the life and > incubation of this project! > > Agreed. The first step is really to get Wave in a Box into a good enough state that we want to be using it for housing development discussions. -Dan On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:21 +0100, "Thomas Wrobel" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'm not sure how any of this works apache/organisation wise, but > > someone on my group (arwave.org) could contribute some simple set up > > instructions for Ubuntu. > > We planned to set up a wiab server for our project anyway - it would > > be nice to have a apache sever to federate with too. > > > > On 8 December 2010 19:00, Paul Lindner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thirded. > > > > > > I suggest that someone with knowledge of how to get wiab up and running > on > > > solaris/ubuntu/freebsd create an INFRA ticket with a step-by-step guide > on > > > what needs to be done. Then offer to work with the infrastructure to > get it > > > done. > > > > > > If you want help structuring the request I highly recommend dropping by > > > #asfinfra on freenode. Nice folks that are happy to help you get stuff > > > done. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Jeff Larkin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> Seconded. There's a certain irony to developing Wave from a > > >> traditional mailing list. =) > > >> > > >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Daniel Page <[email protected] > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > Obviously, we need to get an Apache Wave server for the dev list and > move > > >> the conversations over there! > > >> > > > >> > Daniel Page > > >> > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > >> > > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > From: Mike Mabey <[email protected]> > > >> > Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 08:13:06 > > >> > To: <[email protected]> > > >> > Reply-To: [email protected] > > >> > Subject: A Comment on Cosmetics > > >> > > > >> > I don't know how many other people subscribe to the list as a > digest, but > > >> I > > >> > must say that I'm really going to miss the format of the Google > Group > > >> digest > > >> > email, which was very easy to read and easy to pick out discussions > of > > >> > interest to me. In stark contrast, the Apache Incubator digest is > just a > > >> > long, text-only, really long concatenation of emails, that is > somewhat > > >> > painful to read through. > > >> > > > >> > Does anyone else feel the same way? Is there anything that can be > done > > >> > about it? > > >> > > > >> > So long, beautiful, colorful digest. You will be missed! > > >> > > > >> > Mike M > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- linkedin.com/in/plindner > > > > > >
