Michael, could we informally nominate you as point on the project site? Meanwhile I assume JIRA has an API - does anyone have experience with it? The Google project hosting issue tracker we currently use has a GData API we can use to pull the data.
Alex On 4 January 2011 17:12, Michael MacFadden <[email protected]>wrote: > I agree with Alex. We should get the project infrastructure for the > project up and running before we move the code over. I am very interested > in getting the project site up and running and am more than willing to help > with Jira also. > > ~Michael > > On Jan 3, 2011, at 9:49 PM, Alex North wrote: > > > I've though a little about this, and I know Michael MacFadden has too. My > > first thoughts are that the code should move last, that being the most > > crucial piece to keep working to support existing development. But there > are > > a couple of other pieces to move to Apache infrastructure too. > > > > - Issues to JIRA > > - Continuous build to Apache-hosted Hudson > > - Documentation, etc (probably) > > > > I suggest we can move these first without interrupting development too > much, > > then move the code when everything else is in place. Thoughts? > > > > When it comes to moving the code, I'm not sure there is an easy way to > > import mercurial history. If there's an existing tool, let's use it, but > > otherwise let's just take a snapshot at head and get on with life. > There's > > no complex branching or tags in our repositories, though we do have two > > repositories to somehow squeeze into one (WIAB and the Splash lightweight > > client). > > > > On 3 January 2011 06:08, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> [email protected] ( http://www.apache.org/dev/infra-mail.html ) > >> > >> But keep in mind that this has been discussed to death throughout > Apache, > >> and there is in fact an effort underway to provide git as an option for > the > >> 'canonical' repo. For now it can be used on the client via git-svn. > >> > >> Andrus > >> > >> On Jan 2, 2011, at 8:47 PM, Zachary Jones wrote: > >> > >>> Where is the best place to have the OT disxussion about reasons for > >>> SVN vs. Git? I've found Git quite intuitive from simple to complex, > >>> and I'm curious how others in projects like ASF related with the 'new > >>> tech' > >>> > >>> > >>> Zak > >>> > >>> On Saturday, January 1, 2011, Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> Now that we have almost all accounts in place, I think it is a good > time > >> to discuss migrating the Wave code to the ASF SVN. Not sure if there is > a > >> way to import history/tags/branches from Mercurial to SVN? If not, I > guess > >> we'd have to just import the heads of all relevant branches. Anyways, > that's > >> a question for the Wave developers to answer - how do you want to > proceed > >> with this? > >>>> > >>>> Andrus > >>> > >> > >> > >
