All tech comments are good for the community, but incubator PMC and board
care mostly about community issues.

Quickly from my cell, telling something about the protocol/wiab duality and
steps given looks like possibly relevant, maybe not right now.
El 09/02/2011 11:12, "Paul Thomas" <[email protected]> escribió:
> ...and also graphical client, I would put a brief description of what the
server is. Then a brief description of the point of WAIB as a package.
>
> --- On Wed, 9/2/11, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> From: Paul Thomas <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for February 2011 (
[email protected])
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Wednesday, 9 February, 2011, 10:08
>> How comes no mention of federation? I
>> would put that in the description.
>>
>> --- On Tue, 8/2/11, Soren Lassen <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > From: Soren Lassen <[email protected]>
>> > Subject: Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for February
>> 2011 ([email protected])
>> > To: [email protected]
>> > Date: Tuesday, 8 February, 2011, 20:04
>> > Thanks, Lennard and Yuri. I will
>> > append the following to the wiki page:
>> >
>> > Wave
>> >
>> > Wave lets you communicate and collaborate in real
>> time.
>> > Wave in a Box
>> > project lets developers and enterprise users run wave
>> > servers and host
>> > waves on their own hardware.
>> >
>> > Recent activities:
>> >
>> >  * Old Google Groups mailing list has been
>> disabled
>> >  * SVN Repository has been created, code not
>> migrated yet
>> >  * Confluence space has been created for project
>> > documentation
>> >  * The implementation of search is well under
>> way
>> >  * First cut of persistence has been tested and
>> reviewed
>> >
>> > Most important issues are:
>> >
>> >  * Finish building website and wiki on
>> apache.org
>> >  * Migrate source and issue tracking to
>> apache.org
>> >  * Finish implementation of persistence,
>> search/indexing,
>> > improved
>> > client-server protocol
>> >
>> > Is there a mentor willing to sign off?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Reply via email to