Like scalability. No point to let everybody to import a lot of waves into WIAB server only to discover it's just too much for one machine to handle.
2011/5/19 Ali Lown <[email protected]> > such as...? > > On 18 May 2011 23:49, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yep, and some more things too. > > > > 2011/5/19 Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <[email protected]> > > > >> IMHO better wave persistence and storage are needed before we should > >> consider mass importing from Gwave. > >> > >> --Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro > >> > >> > >> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 17:20, Soren Lassen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > There's some documentation about the data export features in the Data > API > >> > here: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-apis/google-wave-data-api/raw-deltas-export > >> > > >> > > >> > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol/browse_thread/thread/da20836f3552fe0b?pli=1 > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Ali Lown <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Looking at the python interface: I can see the robot.fetch_wavelet > >> > > method, but that only returns a snapshot at that point in time. > >> > > > >> > > How would I request the full history of the wave (wavelet?). > >> > > > >> > > Ali > >> > > > >> > > On 18 May 2011 20:51, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Google Wave Data API was modified to allow to request the whole > >> history > >> > of > >> > >> the wave - which in effect allows to "import" it. But AFAIK no one > is > >> > >> working on a tool that would actually import the history into WIAB > >> > deltas > >> > >> store. > >> > >> > >> > >> 2011/5/18 Ali Lown <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On the old waveprotocol site task list, this is still listed as > >> > waiting for > >> > >> > google to implement export. > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Export has now been available for a while for waves, has any > >> progress > >> > been > >> > >> > made on importing them? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > The HTML option, actually provides the data in a JSON form, is > there > >> > are > >> > >> > parser for this already in the code base? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Ali > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
