The default customized configuration file may not be usable. In my case
(Linux) I had to manually change a few things. I documented the procedure
in this wave:
http://waveinabox.net/#waveinabox.net/w+LDSm7anj7PA
Take a look, maybe it can be extrapolated to a Windows install.

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 19:04, <[email protected]> wrote:

> I recently tried and failed to get Wave In A Box building and running on
> my Windows Server 2008 R2 64bit virtual machine. I followed all the
> instructions in http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box for Windows,
> noting the Source Control change to SVN.  I then got latest at
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/trunk/ on 3/12/2012 using
> TortoiseSVN. I am using the Java SDK jdk1.6.0_31 and WinAnt to do the
> builds. I did not install MongoDB which stated it was optional.
>
>
>
> The first problem I ran into was a one or more tests failing that
> prevented the build from completing. I removed the <junit> tag section to
> prevent the tests from running. This completed the build.
>
>
>
> First question, has anyone recently gotten this to build on a Windows box?
> If so, did you have to do any changes like I did to get it working? If so,
> what specifically did you change?
>
>
>
> After I got the build working by removing the tests, I ran the Windows
> start instructions shown in
> http://www.waveprotocol.org/wave-in-a-box/running-wave-in-a-box/running-the-server#windowsbut
>  starting the server resulted in an exception. The error is:
>
>
>
> Exception in thread "main" com.google.inject.CreationException: Guice
> creation e
> rrors:
>
> 1) An exception was caught and reported. Message:
> 'waveserver_disable_verificati
> on' doesn't map to a Boolean object
> at
> com.google.inject.internal.InjectorShell$Builder.build(InjectorShell.java:1
> 33)
>
> 2) Missing constant value. Please call to(...).
> at
> org.waveprotocol.wave.util.settings.SettingsBinder$3.configure(SettingsBind
> er.java:178)
>
>
>
> It appears to be a configuration issue, but I'm not sure what I should
> change or if its a problem with the build being I built with test failures.
>
>
>
> Any help would be appreciated, we are are trying to do this as a proof
> that we can stand it up in our Windows infrastrucuture so Linux solutions
> are not an option. Thanks!
>
>
>
> Brian
>



-- 
Saludos,
     Bruno González

_______________________________________________
Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
http://www.stenyak.com

Reply via email to