On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado <[email protected]> wrote: > El 25/06/12 15:46, Michael MacFadden escribió: >> Christian, >> >> I think the take away from Kune is the example of integration rather than >> the functionality Kune provides. >> > > Yes, I think so. > > For us the integration was easily because we were using GWT and Guice > already.
So, it does sound like one can access the wave server with javascript easily? > I think that the current Wave code can be improved to help this kind of > integrations. We send some patches in that direction, but more things > can be done. For instance, we have some custom patches of Wave and we > prefer if the integration will be possible out of the box. Also there is > not documentation about how to integrate Wave in other apps, so it was > hard for us to achieve it. If you wrote some blog posts etc on that topic, please let me know. > About scalability, IMHO Apache Wave is not currently scalable and weak > exactly in the parts that were not released by google, that is, delta > persistence, searching, etc, and we have to put our efforts there. > > Anyway if we can help from our experience with kune, just ask. Thank you! Christian > > BR, > -- > Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado > > http://comunes.org > http://ourproject.org > http://homes.ourproject.org/~vjrj/blog (@vjrj) > > "We have lived in this world where little things are done for love and > big things for money. Now we have Wikipedia. Suddenly big things can be > done for love." [Clay Shirky] > > > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
