I think you still need a server of some sorts, cause you can't issue requests from the client to other domain. Also, you would need to authenticate with OAuth. What I intended to say is that Data/Robot API are still mostly supported and one can use to create a custom client - similar to micro-box.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought using the Data APIs required an additional server side > component? At least, all the examples seemed to use app-engine or > servlets of some sort (so client>>sever>wiab rather then client>>wiab) > Is this just there implementation rather then a requirement? > > I was (for years) always just looking for a wave equivalent of Pop3 or > IMAP. The ability for a client to login and read/write to waves on any > wave server. Have I really been so stupid? I wouldn't be surprised... > > On 21 February 2013 20:07, Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the java client compatibility is still intact. Look at > > micro-box.appspot.com - it still functions fine using Robot/Data API > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Id be interested in how you get on - I have been struggling making a > >> Android client for awhile. > >> > >> Back when it was Google wave, there was some libs for client/server > >> interfacing, but since then compatibility was broken and (to my > >> knowledge) no one has done it since. > >> > >> On 21 February 2013 10:01, Ahmet Rasit <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > hi > >> > > >> > I am planning to develop wave client for ios platform and is there any > >> > actual running wave server I can use for testing. > >> > also what is the future for wave? I think interest is getting lower > then > >> > before. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > ahmet raşit demirkan > >> > SeyRah bilişim > >> > www.seyrah.com +902125217678 > >> >
