In moving over all the stuff to the wiki I left the protocol specs and the whitepapers on the protocol website. Maybe we need someone with commit access to that site to leave all the protocol stuff up and delete the rest, and create a github repo or something to host the build files.
Thanks Angus Turner [email protected] On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:32 AM, Ali Lown <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, we can move spec/ and whitepapers/ to the website if that is better. > > You might want to consider how they sat on the waveprotocol site > (along with some other documents not included in spec/whitepapers): > http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol. > (And whether we should have those other documents on the site as well?) > > Ali > > On 3 June 2013 23:29, Angus Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wasn't sure if I was going to include removing the white paper folders > > yet. Just a sudden brainwave. Can we include those folders in the > > website repo? > > > > Sent from my Windows Phone > > From: Ali Lown > > Sent: 4/06/2013 7:40 AM > > To: Angus Turner; Ali Lown; wave > > Subject: Re: Review Request: Removes requestreview > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > > https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/#review21362 > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Ship it! > > > > > > Thanks for this, though you didn't really need to file a > > review-request for since, since I was just going to do it when I next > > went to work on the release. > > > > - Ali Lown > > > > > > On June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m., Angus Turner wrote: > >> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------- > >> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/ > >> ----------------------------------------------------------- > >> > >> (Updated June 3, 2013, 9:21 p.m.) > >> > >> > >> Review request for wave. > >> > >> > >> Description > >> ------- > >> > >> Removes requestreview as per mailing list discussion. > >> > >> > >> Diffs > >> ----- > >> > >> /request_codereview 1489182 > >> > >> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11609/diff/ > >> > >> > >> Testing > >> ------- > >> > >> n/a > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Angus Turner > >> > >> >
