Sure, I guess I can help with this. How we coordinate to ensure we don't
work on the same tests? Would you like to send me a few test class names to
work on?

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:59 PM Evan Hughes <[email protected]> wrote:

> We shouldn't have 2 mocking libraries and mockito is the superior one since
> its continually maintained. We can even do fancy things like this
> http://google.github.io/gwtmockito/ in the future to aid in having the gwt
> js library well tested.
>
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 21:50 Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Great news, thanks Evan!
> > Regarding mockito - what are the issues?
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:20 PM Evan Hughes <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > Been working on removing old dependencies and updating dependencies as
> > can
> > > be seen here
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/tree/fix/dependendices-2016 .
> > It
> > > seems we have to mocking lib's in use, if anyone is good with mockito
> > would
> > > you kindly help in transiting the tests with the other mocking library
> > > (jmock)?
> > >
> > > In other news ive been working on replacing the GXP (Google XML Pages)
> > > which create html pages from a xml markup into standard HTML. This is
> > work
> > > being done to seperate the frontend and make it more modern, more will
> be
> > > shown in coming week. After GXP is removed attention will then turn to
> > the
> > > Protobuf setup we have which atm needs to go through another utility, I
> > > hope to remove this extra step with the transition to proto3. This
> would
> > > mean the sub project PST (protobuf strings templates), would be
> > depreciated
> > > and can be lost to the void.
> > >
> > > After this transitioning the clicent away from the server will be top
> > > priority to allow swellrt to integrate without having bloat. Tis does
> not
> > > mean Wave's intentional purpose is being changed but the entire UI will
> > be
> > > getting an upgrade as it gets transitioned, so expect to see new mixed
> > with
> > > old for a little while.
> > >
> > > ~ Evan
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to