Yeah, I added you to the managers of the discussion group, regarding the waveprotocol.org that is a google site - I have no clue if I can add more admin users and how to do it.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 10:55 AM <pablo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've just joined the google group. Yuri, do you want me to admin the group > too? > > > El 1 feb. 2018 5:49 p. m., Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> escribió: > > I still have admin access to http://www.waveprotocol.org/, however, it > looks like the old discussion group was deleted by Google. I recreated it > from scratch. So, we can try to re-use it. > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wave-protocol > > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:35 PM Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > Yes - that's gonna be a question for someone who was around when > > incubation was starting. > > > > Can you subscribe to those lists still? > > > > On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, at 2:50 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > Zachary, > > > > > > Unfortunately, I don't have an answer for you on that. > > > > > > John > > > > > > On 2018/01/27 18:59:09, Zachary Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I do not recall getting an answer to this before: do we still have > > access > > > > to the old (pre-Apache) mailing list? > > > > > > > > Zachary Yaro > > > > > > > > On Jan 27, 2018 10:53, "Upayavira" <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2018, at 2:34 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I missed sending the notice to this list, apologies. The vote to > > retire > > > > > Wave has passed. > > > > > > > > > > I'm going to begin the process of marking source code as read only, > > as > > > > well > > > > > as shutting down the lists. > > > > > > > > John, > > > > > > > > Would it be possible to schedule the list shutdown at a fixed point > in > > the > > > > future? e.g. 1week? > > > > > > > > Then those that remain here have that time to arrange a new venue for > > > > communication. If no such discussion happens - so be it, but at least > > there > > > > was a window for that discussion. > > > > > > > > Upayavira > > > > > > > >
