Looks like I'm not going to handle multi-operation deltas in my provider yet, since the way I handle operations right now doesn't make it very easy to have non-consecutive versions numbers for deltas.
On Oct 27, 11:57 pm, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 20:41 -0700, Tad Glines wrote: > > No that's normal. The version number is explicitly incremented by the > > number of operations in the delta. I'm not sure why they do that, but > > that's the way it is right now. > > I'd assume that's because each operation is a modification of the wave > state, thus creating a new version of the wave. > -- > James Purser > Collaborynthhttp://collaborynth.com.au > Mob: +61 406 576 553 > Skype: purserj1977 > Twitter:http://twitter.com/purserj --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
