THAT clarifies things. So there are acmewave.com and initech-corp.com work with self-signed certs and wavesandbox.com only with CA-issued certs!
-Ralf On 03.11.2009, at 15:18, Ben Kalman wrote: > The test servers referred to there are the acmewave.com and initech-corp.com > FedOne instances, not wavesandbox.com. > > -- Ben > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 1:13 AM, 24z <[email protected]> wrote: > > The docs state: > > "As the work on the protocol progresses one of the test servers will > be transitioned to only accept CA-issued certificates." > > To me this implies that currently self-signed certs will work just > fine but maybe in the future CA-issued will be required. What do you > think? Anybody from Google around to clarify? > > > On Nov 3, 3:01 pm, Joe Gregorio <[email protected]> wrote: > > CA-issued certificates are required. > > > > Thanks, > > -joe > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 8:59 AM, 24z <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Brief question: Can we connect to wavesandbox.com (federate) > with self- > > > signed certificates or do we need CA-issued ones? I've heard from > > > others, that self-signed work just fine. > > > > > Ralf Rottmann eMail: [email protected] Blog: www.24100.net www.thenextweb.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/24z LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/rottmann --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
