On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]> wrote:

> Getting closer to making the bot work (for anybody that is interested I'm
> working with jsonbot, which was mentioned by its Author at one of the office
> hours). I've managed to get it to use the Passive APIs, but I'm not seeing
> any triggers in my logs for the Active API as of yet.. On a side note, while
> testing robots, is it correct they do not currently federate?


They should federate afaict. I personally never tested it though.

Greetings,
Lennard


>
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Lennard de Rijk <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Matt Richards <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Coolness! Last question (for now) is the Data API authentication "dance"
>>> fully implemented at this stage in the development?
>>> I noticed when I registered the URL, waveinabox did provide me
>>> with credentials.  Am I able to take an existing robot and bring it over?
>>>
>>
>> Yes the oauth token and secret are in use for the active api and the
>> 3-legged dance for the data api is implemented as well. Let me know how it
>> goes, you might run into small problems when using the active api with
>> setting the new server and such.
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Lennard
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:05 PM, Lennard de Rijk 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Matt Richards <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, I applied [0] and registered [1] as a robot within my server
>>>>> using the memory based account storage. Echoey works using GAE, the next
>>>>> step I'd like to take is using Jetty on my own server hardware. Does the
>>>>> registration function the same way for self hosted robots? Simply changing
>>>>> the URL my Jetty installation?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the Robot API makes no assumption on what domain you are running.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> Lennard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Lennard de Rijk <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Matt Richards 
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd like to start testing the Robot API in Wave in a Box if its
>>>>>>> possible. Are the operations far enough along where the robot is able to
>>>>>>> accomplish anything user visible?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you apply [0] Echoey will work. I hope to get this code tested and
>>>>>> submitted in the upcoming week. Robots can already reply and make new 
>>>>>> blips
>>>>>> using [2].
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I saw there was an echoey robot example submitted a while back, how
>>>>>>> can I get this setup to test with? Do I need to use GAE?  I'm not very 
>>>>>>> clear
>>>>>>> on how self hosted robots can be setup.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't have to run in on appengine, you can run it on anything that
>>>>>> can host a Java Servlet (Apache, Jetty, etc). In fact this version is not
>>>>>> really suited for appengine thanks to the cached dictionary that is being
>>>>>> used, if you replace that with a normal hashmap you build up every 
>>>>>> request
>>>>>> then you can push it to appengine, such a version is actually running on
>>>>>> [1].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To use the appengine version you should go to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://yourserver+port/robot/register/create
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fill in a username for your robot and point it to [1]. Now when you
>>>>>> add that username to a wave the robot will be called. Make sure that you 
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> running the memory or mongodb accountstore otherwise registration will 
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> work. And don't forget to patch in [0].
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope this helps,
>>>>>> Lennard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [0] http://codereview.waveprotocol.org/221001/show
>>>>>> [1] http://echoey-wave.appspot.com/
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/browse/src/org/waveprotocol/box/server/robots/operations/BlipOperationServices.java
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --Matt
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
>>>>> .
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> --Matt
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Wave Protocol" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Wave Protocol" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
>> .
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> --Matt
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to