I was trying to stay out of this, but... On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Michal Suchanek <hramr...@centrum.cz> wrote: > This is *not* *about* *optimization*. If you rely on *every* *single* > *client* to be responsive for your WM to work then the moment *any* > *single* *client* becomes unresponsive your WM *breaks*. > > If you think a non-broken WM is an optimization I guess we live in > somewhat different worlds.
Strawman; it is always possible to multiplex I/O in a way that prevents any single client from blocking things being done in other clients or internal server work. ~ C. P.S. I want an amethyst bikeshed. Not purple, mind you; I want the bikeshed carved out of a giant amethyst geode. It'll be awesome, I promise. -- When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir? ~ Keynes Corbin Simpson <mostawesomed...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
