2013/3/18 Yichao Yu <[email protected]> > On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Hardening <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 17/03/2013 23:59, Sylvain BERTRAND wrote: > [...]
> > As most of the time the compositor launched all the wayland clients, > > they may be killed before they discover the socket has disconnected. > > > > It can be seen as a "hurry to cleanup before being killed" message. > > In this case, shouldn't the compositor just disconnect the socket > instead of sending out this event in order to info the client? > I think implicit is better than explicit, and having the message gives no place for interpretation of why the socket would have disconnect. In first hand i thought about watching the "global_remove" notification being called on notorious objects, but i've found that solution a little hackish.
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
