While I won't comment about the ban itself, I'm not so sure that this part:
[email protected] wrote: > The final problem was that, despite his proclamations that he intended to keep his forks compatible with wayland, he refused to use the existing mechanism to retain protocol compatibility to make the protocol changes he needed, without providing a reason. I'm not a wayland expert, but if memory serves he did provide a reason for the minimize part, he thought that it should be introduced at the same point as the maximize request which is in the wayland protocol. renoX
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
