On Fri, 17 May 2013 16:20:48 -0400 Kristian Høgsberg <hoegsb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 04:46:03PM +0300, ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: > > From: Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> > > > > Mention, that sub-surfaces are not clipped to the parent. > > Be more accurate on surface commit vs. apply state. > > Mention the initial stacking order. > > That looks good, applied. I can't help thinking that it should > asynchronous instead of desynchronized. To desynchronize means to > bring something out of synchronization, and desynchronized is > something that has been brought out of synchronization. Ae > synchronous and asynchronous better names for the states? Perhaps. Inventing good names is one of the most difficult things in design. I'd like to have completely different words here, not just one or two character difference. I'm ok with changing them and keeping them. Thanks for merging so quickly! - pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
