On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Neil Roberts <n...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Here is a series of patches to add an extension which makes it > possible to create an EGL context without specifying a config. A > context created in this way can be bound with any surface using the > same EGLDisplay rather than being restricted to those using the same > config. The main use case is that it would then be possible for a > Wayland compositor to drive two displays which may have different > bit-depths without having to wastefully create two contexts. > > Mesa seems to mostly cope with this already so the patches are mostly > just to add the extension and remove the restriction. > > There is also a patch for Piglit to try and test the extension. I > tried running the branch though the 'all tests' test suite and apart > from this new test now passing there was only one difference which is > that the GLX_OML_sync_control/swapbuffersmsc-divisor-zero test failed. > However if I run piglit-run.py again and set a regexp so it only runs > that one test then it passes so I'm wondering if it might just be an > intermittent failure. > > The main thorny issue with the extension is how to handle the initial > value of glDrawBuffer when a configless context is used. If a config > is used then we can just say the default is GL_BACK if the config is > double-buffered and GL_FRONT otherwise. I have taken the approach that > this decision is made the first time the context is bound rather than > when it is first created. There should be no way to query the value of > glDrawBuffer until the context is first bound so it shouldn't cause > any harm that Mesa changes the value at that point. I think this is > worth doing for the convenience to the application which would > otherwise have to remember to explicitly set it to GL_BACK in the > common case that double-buffering is used. > > I've also included a couple of patches to take advantage of the > extension in Weston.
Thanks Neil, series applied to mesa and weston. Kristian > Regards, > - Neil > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-...@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel