Yep, DISPLAY always needs to be set - and I figured, there's a reason On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:40:15 +0100 > Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On 26 May 2015 at 10:26, Giulio Camuffo <giuliocamu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2015-05-26 12:21 GMT+03:00 Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com>: > > >> I have a vague recollection this has been proposed before, but I can't > > >> remember if there was any interest or discussion, nor what was the > > >> original intent behind defaulting to "wayland-0". > > > > Probably to match X11's behaviour of using :0 in the absence of a > $DISPLAY. > > Really? ;-) > > $ export -n DISPLAY > $ xterm > xterm: Xt error: Can't open display: > xterm: DISPLAY is not set > > Geany and gqview fail to start, and konsole segfaults (lol). > > > Thanks, > pq >
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
