On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 04:32:41PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> This is "once-tested, don't touch it again" code. The quirks on the touchpad
> means we'd have to find that specific device again and re-test everything if
> we change anything elsewhere in the code. So duplicate it properly, so that we
> don't have to touch it again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net>
> ---
> src/filter.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/filter.c b/src/filter.c
> index 16dedb4..6e20069 100644
> --- a/src/filter.c
> +++ b/src/filter.c
> @@ -337,6 +337,32 @@ accelerator_filter_low_dpi(struct motion_filter *filter,
> return accelerated;
> }
>
> +static struct normalized_coords
> +accelerator_filter_x230(struct motion_filter *filter,
> + const struct normalized_coords *unaccelerated,
> + void *data, uint64_t time)
> +{
> + struct pointer_accelerator *accel =
> + (struct pointer_accelerator *) filter;
> + double accel_factor; /* unitless factor */
> + struct normalized_coords accelerated;
> + double velocity; /* units/us */
> +
> + feed_trackers(accel, unaccelerated, time);
> + velocity = calculate_velocity(accel, time);
> + accel_factor = calculate_acceleration(accel,
> + data,
> + velocity,
> + accel->last_velocity,
> + time);
> + accel->last_velocity = velocity;
> +
> + accelerated.x = accel_factor * unaccelerated->x;
> + accelerated.y = accel_factor * unaccelerated->y;
> +
> + return accelerated;
> +}
> +
> static void
> accelerator_restart(struct motion_filter *filter,
> void *data,
> @@ -661,17 +687,39 @@ create_pointer_accelerator_filter_touchpad(int dpi)
> return &filter->base;
> }
>
> +struct motion_filter_interface accelerator_interface_x230 = {
> + accelerator_filter_x230,
> + accelerator_restart,
> + accelerator_destroy,
> + accelerator_set_speed,
> +};
> +
> +/* The Lenovo x230 has a bad touchpad. This accel method has been
> + * trial-and-error'd, any changes to it will require re-testing everything.
> + * Don't touch this.
> + */
> struct motion_filter *
> create_pointer_accelerator_filter_lenovo_x230(int dpi)
> {
> struct pointer_accelerator *filter;
>
> - filter = create_default_filter(dpi);
> - if (!filter)
> + filter = zalloc(sizeof *filter);
> + if (filter == NULL)
> return NULL;
>
> - filter->base.interface = &accelerator_interface;
> + filter->base.interface = &accelerator_interface_x230;
> filter->profile = touchpad_lenovo_x230_accel_profile;
> + filter->last_velocity = 0.0;
> +
> + filter->trackers =
> + calloc(NUM_POINTER_TRACKERS, sizeof *filter->trackers);
> + filter->cur_tracker = 0;
> +
> + filter->threshold = v_ms2us(0.4);
> + filter->accel = 2.0;
> + filter->incline = 1.1;
Should we make these macros just with a _X230 postfix or something? So
even though they are magic (as the other) we'd keep the magic in the
same place. If you disagree with that, at least make the same comments
regarding unitless and units (for the second two at least).
In any way, Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <jad...@gmail.com>
Jonas
> +
> + filter->dpi_factor = 1; /* unused for this accel method */
>
> return &filter->base;
> }
> --
> 2.4.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> wayland-devel mailing list
> wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
_______________________________________________
wayland-devel mailing list
wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
