On 25/09/15 07:24 AM, ahmet acar wrote: > Hi Derek. Thanks for review. > >> Really silly nit-pick, but I think most terminals (gnome-terminal, >> xterm, terminology anyway) call this -e >> So I guess it would be nice to be consistent. > > NO. I tested it that '-e' switch didn't work. > > it works with script files(*.sh) as its argument > > but can't execute binary executables.it complains about binary files.
Oh, I didn't mean call the shell with -e. I meant that xterm, gnome-terminal, and terminology all have a -e option to do this. if I want to do the same thing with other terminals, I'd do: xterm -e "nano main.c" gnome-terminal -e "nano main.c" terminology -e "nano main.c" I guess maybe the closest we can get right now is weston-terminal -e"nano main.c" because our option parser is garbage. But I think that's at least a little closer to what someone might expect... And if at some point in the future we make the option parser a little less idiosyncratic, we'll be just like everyone else. >> Should be using tabs instead of spaces in front of that if statement. >> And in front of that } >> Funny formatting here too. > > I am sory. These are not intentional; just frustrating corruptions. > Because of i am inexperienced and sends email manually as > copy patch from editor paste to browser etc. > i will resend it via git send-mail Once it's all set up, git send-email is really quite easy to use. :) _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel