Hi, I personally create the patches with git format-patch and then copy to the email. Because I have to use windows and outlook for my company email.
Best regards Emre Ucan Software Group I (ADITG/SW1) Tel. +49 5121 49 6937 > -----Original Message----- > From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel- > boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Pekka Paalanen > Sent: Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 13:02 > To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Damien Lespiau > Subject: Patchwork to require git-send-email formatted patches? > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:35:35 +0000 > Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Something else I noticed on this thead: > > > > In the reply 20151019013047.GA8175@jelly.local from Peter, there's a > > diff put there for reference, picked up as a patch by patchwork: > > > > > > > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20151019013047.GA8175@j > el > > ly.local > > > > If you want patchwork to not consider those kind of diffs as real > > patches, there's a per-project option I can activate: only consider > > git send-email mails as potential patches. > > Hi all, > > I think we could turn that on. What do others think? > > How is a git-send-email patch recognized? Would we miss patches that are > formatted with git-format-patch but sent by other means than git-send- > email? > > > Thanks, > pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
