Hi, On 19 November 2015 at 01:21, Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> > wrote: >> discrete events are latching for axis events though, they're not just >> grouped in the same frame, they always precede the axis event. If you have >> two axis updates in the same frame, the only allowed order is: >> axis_discrete >> axis >> axis_discrete >> axis >> frame >> >> it is not permitted to have: >> axis_discrete >> axis_discrete >> axis >> axis >> frame >> >> Theoretically possible now that we carry the axis information, but that'd >> require buy-in from all the current reviewers.
Fine by me, and my R-b stands. > I think you might want to check to see if everybody thinks that is ok, > because it makes things simpler by only having to talk about frames, and > removing the latching discussion. I think what is happening is that wayland > is starting to group events and requests, and is settling on an idea of a > frame message to delimit the groups, rather than the latching idea. Grouping and latching are two quite different things, operating in different directions. As long as they're well-specified, and generally in keeping with existing precedent, then that's fine. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
