Hi Bryce, On 12 May 2016 at 01:16, Bryce Harrington <br...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:08:12AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Thanks for these! My only concern is that they're licensed under >> CC-SA, which is a fine license, but does significantly complicate the >> redistribution status of our tarball, from 'just MIT, do whatever and >> no-one cares' to 'mostly that, but be careful with the icons'. >> >> Is there any chance of having the icons relicensed under the same >> license as the rest of our tree? > > Note in data/COPYING that the terminal icon and the DMZ cursors > (whatever they are), are already being included as CC-SA.
Ugh, I completely failed to notice that ... > Regarding mixing of different licenses for code vs. data, this is a > common practice elsewhere - you'll frequently see games with FOSS source > code and proprietary graphics (I seem to recall this is even spelled out > in a GNU or CC faq somewhere), and the code-as-GPL&art-as-CC tradition > appears pretty widespread in GNOME at least. Totally. I wasn't against the concept per se, just noting that it would change our distribution from MIT to MIT+CC-SA. But if we're already in that boat, then no change, thus consider my objection dropped. Sorry for the noise. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel