On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 18:45:59 -0700 Bryce Harrington <br...@osg.samsung.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 06:01:52PM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:44:20 -0700 > > Bryce Harrington <br...@osg.samsung.com> wrote: > > > > > Surface activity is determined by what surface is being displayed > > > fullscreen. Only a single surface can be active in the shell. > > > > Hi, > > > > only a single surface can be active? But there is a surface for every > > output. > > > > Shouldn't every visible surface be active in this case, as the shell > > protocol enforces a single visible surface per output policy? > > Then in that case can all this just be shortcircuited and make all > surfaces be active? If I understand what you're saying then by > definition with fullscreen-shell there would be no such thing as > non-active surfaces. I think there could be non-visible surfaces which would then be also non-active. I don't quite recall if fullscreen-shell supported multiple clients and switching between them, even if a single client never had extra surfaces. Jason? Thanks, pq
pgp5b5ULZI__5.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
