To be clear, my first look at how the X11 channel is used in practice hasn't yet turned up the justification for its existence. The logic usually seems to be "if X client, send event over X11, else Wayland," which is redundant. There must be something big, since tacking on a X11 channel is a big protocol extension, but I haven't found any discussion of that design decision. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks, Joseph On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Joseph Burt <caseo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Most Wayland compositors, Weston and WLC-based ones included, carry > around a bit of XWM code, essentially a protocol extension, to deal > with Xwayland. Why? What is lacking in Xwayland? > > Thanks, > Joseph _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
