On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 11:01:09 -0600 Matt Hoosier <matt.hoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Pekka, > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/ESB) > <eu...@de.adit-jv.com> wrote: > > Actually, IMO ivi-shell is not a proper wayland compositor. > > Because it is violating wayland protocol by not supporting wl_shell > > interface. > > > > Therefore, we have to at least support wl_shell interface in > > ivi-shell. Why not support it via libweston-desktop ? > > I'm wondering if you have any thoughts on this one specific point that > Emre made. I know there's a lot of heartburn over the inclusion of > wl_shell into the core protocol, and you wouldn't do it that way if > that decision were getting made today. Hi, I have a long reply brewing for that email and several points you raised, but I have not had the time to finish it yet. It is very time consuming to write the rebuttal for this proposal. Thanks, pq
pgp8wSxoka5Az.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
