On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 10:43:12 +0100 Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 July 2018 at 10:41, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 2 July 2018 at 03:07, Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:02:19AM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> On 11 June 2018 at 10:25, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > On Mon, 11 Jun 2018 09:29:49 +1000 > >>> > Peter Hutterer <peter.hutte...@who-t.net> wrote: > >>> >> +PKG_CHECK_MODULES(LIBDRM, [libdrm >= 2.4.68], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([ > >>> >> libdrm is a hard build-time dependency for libweston core, > >>> >> but a sufficient version was not found. However, libdrm > >>> >> is not a runtime dependency unless you have features > >>> > > >>> > this patch is correct, but I would like to hear more opinions if we > >>> > want to bump the hard build-time dependency from release of Jan 2012 to > >>> > Apr 2016. > >>> > > >>> > If we do this bump, we could remove the fallback definitions for > >>> > DRM_FORMAT_R8 and DRM_FORMAT_GR88. > >>> > > >>> > In case we want to consider bumping even further, DRM_FORMAT_MOD_* were > >>> > introduced in 2.4.83 (Aug 2017), and atomic in 2.4.78 (Apr 2017). > >>> > >>> I'd be in favour of bumping all the way to .83. It's available in > >>> Debian testing and unstable, as well as for stable (stretch) via the > >>> backports.debian.org repository. It's available for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS > >>> via the xenial-updates repository, and releases since. It's available > >>> in Yocto Rocko (Oct 2017), but unsurprisingly not in Pyro (May 2017); > >>> I believe there are a few BSPs based on Pyro and earlier still, but > >>> they would be pretty trivial bumps to include if vendors want to > >>> upgrade Weston. > >>> > >>> Either patch is: > >>> Acked-by: Daniel Stone <dani...@collabora.com> > >> > >> pekka: gentle ping, if you're happy with this one > >> > > On Debian front: > > - oldstable: 2.4.74 in backports > > - stable: 2.4.74 in main, 2.4.91 in backports > > > > Ubuntu: > > - 16.04: 2.4.83 in xenial-updates > > - 14.04: 2.4.67 in trusty-updates > > > > In other words, Trusty is def. out of the question: I'd go with this > > patch for now to unblock. > > Might want to bump to .83 closer to the release/branch point. > > > Should have added: As-is patch is > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com> Thank you all, pushed: 90718170..efdebbc4 master -> master Btw. we should be getting alpha release on the 10th, so that's pretty close now. Do we want a bump to .83 and clean-up before or after 5.0.0 release? Looking at Emil's list of distributions, I would go for .83 already right now. Thanks, pq
pgpnpR4uIMakX.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel