On Thu Sep 19, 2019 at 9:02 PM Jonas Ådahl wrote: > I think that if there is a consensus that it's within the correct scope > and no-one nacks it, there shouldn't need be any artifical bureaucratic > road blocks in the way.
I mean, I'm not in any particular hurry to get any particular protocol through the process. An implementation is a key part of the development of a protocol and almost always reveals flaws in the protocol that a human reading alone wouldn't. The difference between client and server implementations can be similarly revealing, and it's nice to have more people looking at a protocol with this degree of care. However, I agree with your reasoning that multiple clients and a single compositor still creates a system of stakeholders which would benefit from this process. What if we required the sum of implementations (client or server) to be 3 or more? _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
