On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:13:19 +0200 Olivier Fourdan <four...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 at 10:39, Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote: > > > > And from the corresponding glxinfo / vulkaninfo & friends, which don't > > have their own repositories either. The only exception that comes to > > mind offhand is xdpyinfo, but that's just because every single app got > > its own repository when the monolithic X tree was split up, which > > these days seems to be generally considered as having gone overboard. > > Right, so, to move forward with this, I shall: > > - Rename the repository to “wayland-utils” > - Move the source into its own subdirectory (so we can have more later) > Sounds good. > Regarding weston-info, shouldn't we add a deprecation warning before > actually removing it? Or maybe add a symlink weston-info→wayland-info > ? Personally I'd be fine leaving that with distribution packagers. That way we upstream don't have to deal with weston<->wayland-utils conflicts or dependencies. As there is no conflict to begin with, we're not in a hurry to remove weston-info. We can do that in the next Weston release after the first wayland-utils release. Thanks, pq
pgp1EpideyYM7.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
