On Friday, June 10th, 2022 at 10:41, Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> Anything I've missed? Or got completely wrong? This plan looks good to me. As Pekka mentionned, I'd also like to have a conversation of how far we want to push virtualized driver features. I think KMS support is a good feature to have to spin up a VM and have all of the basics working. However I don't think it's a good idea to try to plumb an ever-growing list of fancy features (seamless integration of guest windows into the host, HiDPI, multi-monitor, etc) into KMS. You'd just end up re-inventing Wayland or RDP on top of KMS. Instead of re-inventing these, just use RDP or waypipe or X11 forwarding directly. So I think we need to draw a line somewhere, and decide e.g. that virtualized cursors are fine to add in KMS, but HiDPI is not.
