On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 9:15 AM Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe <[email protected]>
wrote:


> SRFI 189 talks of objects that satisfy 'error-object' in several
> places. Of course, this should be 'error-object?'. I've fixed this
> and opened a pull request.
>
> https://github.com/scheme-requests-for-implementation/srfi-189/pull/22
>

Thanks very much.  This seems clear.  Just in case, I've sent it to John
for approval.

Reply via email to