On Wed, Jun 4, 2025 at 12:30 PM Daphne Preston-Kendal <[email protected]> wrote:
> Let me also note here I something I idly thought-aloud on IRC recently: > the best convention would probably be (srfi <library name>-<library > number>), where the two template parts form a single identifier. That would > be R6RS compatible, and force SRFI authors to come up with names. Examples > would be (srfi lists-1), (srfi records-9), etc. > I like this idea. It also has the advantage that naming conflicts are automatically resolved. For example, we could have (srfi match-241), (srfi match-257), and (srfi match-262).
