Well, I learned from this experience. I don't want the photo with or without the water mark, but I was curious. I think it's a good topic for discussion too, but looking at my instructions, below, they are wrong, but I'm really too pooped to care at this time. I'm so very tired, I think it's past my bed time.

jan
===

Mary L Rusinko wrote:
Jan wrote: "What's weird is that when I clicked on the link, it opened a
mini window and that picture had the watermark on it. Just for curiosity, I right clicked and saved the picture and there is no watermark on that one. Don't you think the saved picture should have the watermark on it too?"


Well.... I was wondering the same thing myself! When I right clicked on
the actual article photo, ie; the smaller picture, my browser came back
with a "disabled" feature. (IE 6.0) So I saved the whole web page to my
hard to check the pic's!


It is strange that the smaller photo had no watermark Even in my
photoshop! I guess they feel that viewers are more likely to "steal" the
larger photos and copyright them as opposed to copyrighting the smaller
pictures?!!?! I thought it was an interesting topic for more discussion
here. Just some food for thought here!


Thanks!

Mary Rusinko - Omaha, NE, USA


____ • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • ____
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version:
http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub


________________ http://www.wdvl.com _______________________

You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to