----- Original Message -----
From: <john.f.hughes
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: March 31, 2004 12:13 AM
Subject: [wdvltalk] Re: Client side include?
> As an aside. If we take the method
> <script type="text/javascript" src="myInclude.js"></script>
> as an example, I wonder which would be quicker and more economic: ssi
or
> simply using the javascript include if you were serving the page over
the
> www. Do any of you happen to know?
Over the web your customers would perceive the server side includes to
be faster as they are generated before anything is output to the browser
(the client) and then it is part of that page file, not as a separate
file when they see it. With the JavaScript solution, the included code
must be downloaded first along with the JavaScript code to actually
include it. The client side never sees the server side include.
hth!
cheers,
Mark
____ • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • ____
To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To set a personal password send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words: "set
WDVLTALK pw=yourpassword" in the body of the email.
To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk digest version:
http://wdvl.internet.com/WDVL/Forum/#sub
________________ http://www.wdvl.com _______________________
You are currently subscribed to wdvltalk as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016
Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
