On 12/16/2011 04:08 PM, Luc de Louw wrote:
> On 12/15/2011 05:26 PM, Richard Pijnenburg wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> In the mail "Problems " there was a short discussion regarding the
>> development standstill of web-cyradm.
>> Currently im also using web-cyradm but missing features and the continuing
>> development.
>> Since i'm also a php developer i've been thinking of making a new version
>> my self.
>>
>> If anyone is interested to jump in with idea's, coding or other sorts
>> please let me know.
>> Im reachable on [email protected]
> 
> Hi Richard et al,
> 
> Yes, the development stands still since a couple of years. There are three 
> main reasons for that:
> 
> - I was frustrated when I was calling for translations during the 0.5.4 
> release cycle and nobody responded.
> 
> - I have less and less time to keep on working on the project since several 
> years.
> 
> - I failed to establish a broader project government to make the project 
> independent from my person.
> 
> Forking is good, revive a existing project is may be better. If you like, you 
> can take over the domain and the project name if you like and if you have a 
> proper plan how to proceed further.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Luc
Hi Luc,

Glad to see that you are still paying attention to your 'baby'.  I haven't seen 
anything to beat it in all the time I have been using it, and I have been 
seriously looking each time I have to rebuild my server.  (though is has gotten 
easier since I switched to CentOS from Fedora :-)

I remember your request for translators and regret that I did not have time to 
spare to help out.

This sudden interest in reviving the project is heartening.  And even though 
there has been no advances for quite awhile, web-cyradm is still a very useful 
program.

Thanks for all your work on creating web-cyradm!

Emmett
_______________________________________________
Web-cyradm mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.web-cyradm.org/mailman/listinfo/web-cyradm

Reply via email to