Hi, On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:59:50AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> | The Free Software | Foundation promises to always use either a > verbatim copying license or a free | documentation license when > publishing your contribution. Why the verbatim copying option? > | If this is absolutely not what you want then you are free allowed -- > after | having spent some more thoughts on it -- to replace *Free > Software Foundation, | Inc.* with *The Contributing Authors* and > remove the *By contributing [...] | redistribute your contributions* > paragraph. Is this really necessary? I suggest dropping it. If someone really really doesn't want to assign copyright -- well, nobody forces them to edit the wiki. Also, they still can change the conditions; explicitely mentioning the option will only give some people stupid ideas... > Of course this can only be done automatically when using web-editing, > but the people using the rcs (i.e. Git) interface for creating new > pages will usually know what to do. I guess one could do something using hook sripts, e.g. complain when the notice is missing, or even add it automatically. -antrik- _______________________________________________ Web-hurd mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/web-hurd
