mike bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm all for WSGI being as much of a "standard" as we should be embracing. > But the Python community is a lot more varied than the Ruby one; people > are thinking way out in their own boxes and have their preferred way of > doing things (i.e. like people who only want to do python-generated > HTML)...instead of reacting to and imitating the Ruby community, we should > be presenting the world with our own community, where here are our > favorite ways of doing web applications, but there are several varieties > of how we do it. In the Python world, you have to use your brain a little > bit.
I'm totaly agree with this. I use python to make office intranet, web games, project management, monitoring, forum... So much think that don't need the same framework, the same server, the same template engine. I had to do my own framework and it was very easy in python :-) Before for the sames things i had to use php, java, C... The slogan of python-for-the-web could be "so easy to do his own framework" ! It was for this that i switched from php for python (did you try to make a serious framework in php !?) It was just difficult for me to decide if i must hack simplehttpserver or choose one server in the jungle. I also had to make my own session layer... I think wsgi adress this and it's very fine. We must just help developpers to make theirs components wsgi compliants, more tutorials, more examples like wsgikit. I personaly don't think we need to follow ruby or php example. When somes frameworks will said "choose a wsgi server from this list" we'll win :-)! -- William - http://flibuste.net _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com