On 10/14/05, Shannon -jj Behrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was following the "with" statement thing for a while, but eventually
> gave up on keeping up with the dev mailing list. Please correct me if
> I'm wrong, but the benefit of my library is also that you don't have
> to nest things inside each other. I.e. it's a flat list of (init,
> destruct) that is implemented as nested try/finallys but doesn't look
> like that. Hence, it's easy to construct such lists and rearrange
> them dynamically [or inject things into them from within subclasses].
>
> Am I mistaken?
No, you're right, but I had assumed it would be easy enough to write a
"combined" function which allowed you to transform
with a:
with b:
with c:
whatever
into
with combined(a,b,c):
whatever
Having said that, this is probably just what your library does, but
recast to work with the "with" statement...
Paul.
_______________________________________________
Web-SIG mailing list
[email protected]
Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
