At 09:06 PM 12/17/2007 +0100, Manlio Perillo wrote: >Phillip J. Eby ha scritto: >>This is precisely why WSGI doesn't really have any "configuration" >>defined, because the whole idea is that it should be as >>"plug-and-play" as possible. Server-level configuration options >>are a liability to be avoided, a sometimes-necessary evil. They >>aren't a feature. > >Disagree.
Note that your disagreement doesn't retroactively change WSGI's design goals or rationale, which are what I've been explaining. Your desire for configuration in one place also doesn't negate others' desires to simply drop applications into a server with only the most minimal server configuration possible. _______________________________________________ Web-SIG mailing list Web-SIG@python.org Web SIG: http://www.python.org/sigs/web-sig Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/web-sig/archive%40mail-archive.com
